Seafood Processors & Wholesalers
Why it is not a good idea to insure your seafood in a
Property/Liability Package or a Separate Property Policy.
The most common way of insuring seafood stock for seafood
Processors or Wholesalers is through a Property/Liability Package Policy or a
separate Property Policy. However, the most common way is the wrong way to insure
temperature-sensitive seafood stock and will result in uninsured or
underinsured events that could cost you many hundreds of thousands of dollars. These policies were not
designed to address the normally occurring risks of a seafood business
and no amount of modification will satisfactorily eliminate all the defects.
Twenty-seven years of seafood stock loss history
show that Change of Temperature is the most frequent cause of loss while goods
are stored at process plants and warehouses or while goods are being
transported by truck around the country.
The following is a brief analysis of the coverage defects that exist in
Property/Liability Package Policies or Separate Property Policies.
Coverage Defects That Exist in Property/Liability Package Policies or Separate Property Policies:
_______________________________________________________________________________
● Change of Temperature – Mechanical Breakdown: Only covered due to mechanical breakdown or failure of
refrigerating
equipment.
Coverage
Caveats:
1)
Policyholder must maintain a refrigeration maintenance or service contract
2)
Loss must happen only at a premises described in the
policy
3) The “described premises” must be owned by the policyholder or by others and seafood
stock
must be in the care, custody or control of the
Policyholder.
”COT” COVERAGE IS ELIMINATED AT
FACILITIES DUE TO 1-3 ABOVE
FOR OTHER THAN MECHANICAL
BREAKDOWN, IS ALSO EXCLUDED.
ESTIMATED UNINSURED
● Change of Temperature – Power Outage: Only covered due to conditions beyond the control of the Policyholder,
on
or off the premises.
COT” COVERAGE DUE TO POWER
OUTAGE IS ELIMINATED AT
ESTIMATED
UNINSURED
● Direct Physical Loss – Perils Insured: The word “Direct” eliminates certain coverage. Losses, such as fire,
collapse, wind, water damage, earthquake, flood, etc., that do not impact directly on seafood stock and cause
a change of temperature,
resulting in a loss to seafood stock, are not covered.
THIS IS A MAJOR
DEFICIENCY. A SMALL LOSS TO THE
REFRIGERATING MOTOR/COMPRESSOR
CAN CAUSE A LARGE CHANGE OF TEMPERATURE LOSS THAT IS NOT COVERED.
ESTIMATED
UNINSURED
● Goods of Others: Many Processors and
Wholesalers sell their goods to others but hold them in the
processor/wholesaler’s warehouse. Some Package and Special Property Policies do provide bailee
coverage but at
low limits,
such as $10,000 to $25,000. Some provide
no coverage at all.
HOLDING GOODS OF
OTHERS IS GENERALLY CONSIDERED A BAILMENT, WHERE YOU
TO THE OWNER FOR DAMAGE.
THE RUDE AWAKENING COMES WHEN EITHER THE OWNER OF THE
GOODS SUES YOU OR THEIR INSURER SUES YOU FOR THE DAMAGE DONE TO THE GOODS WHILE
IN YOUR POSSESSION.
ESTIMATED UNINSURED
● Coinsurance Penalty: Many Policies have a coinsurance penalty clause which requires the Policyholder to
insure to a proper value based on the “Valuation” clause. Failure results in a penalty at time of loss. Stock
value variability is the major
factor in the failure to insure to proper value under the coinsurance clause.
FEW POLICYHOLDERS
UNDERSTAND THE IMPACT OF THIS PENALTY
COMPLIANCE WITH THE POLICY REQUIREMENT. EIGHTY-
POLICYHOLDERS
REDUCED CLAIM PAYMENT—AS MUCH AS 50%.
ESTIMATED UNINSURED
● Valuation Clause: This is the most important and most misunderstood policy element. The “Valuation Clause”
determines
what you will be paid at time of loss.
The inflexible nature of the “Valuation Clauses” found in a
Property/Liability
Package Policy or a separate Property Policy results in the Policyholder’s
inability to be fully
compensated
for a loss. Moreover, having the wrong
valuation makes it much more difficult to adjust a loss.
MOST POLICYHOLDERS DO NOT
REALIZE THE SIGNIFICANCE OF “VALUATION”
THE TIME SPENT ARGUING OVER WHAT SHOULD BE PAID, BECAUSE THE POLICY IS VAGUE
TO
REFLECT THE
ESTIMATED UNINSURED
_______________________________________________________________________________
● Multiple Coverage Forms: Multiple Coverage Forms must be used by insurers who issue Package Policies or
Separate
Property Policies to provide
coverage for seafood stock.
1) Forms differ in coverage, limitation, warranties, and exclusions, causing multiple uninsured or
underinsured events.
2) Multiple forms cause severe confusion to policyholders and great difficulty to the courts who
interpret the forms.
MOST OF THE FORMS
CAN NOT BE CHANGED, DUE TO STATE REGULATION. SOME PROVIDE
OVERLAPPING COVERAGE.
SOME HAVE EXCLUSIONS THAT CAN NOT BE
MODIFIED. NONE OF THE
POLICIES ALLOW
FOR SEAMLESS SEAFOOD STOCK COVERAGE WHEN THE STOCK CHANGES
ENVIRONMENT, E.G., WAREHOUSE TO TRUCK TO WAREHOUSE. USING THE CORRECT POLICY IS
ESTIMATED UNINSURED
● Policyholder Must Prove Loss: Using the coverage forms issued under a Package Policy or Separate Property
Policy places the onus on the Policyholder to prove the existence of coverage at time of loss. Policyholders
are at a
disadvantage and
poorly-equipped to prove the existence of coverage at time of loss.
A POLICYHOLDER,
IN THE CASE OF CHANGE OF TEMPERATURE, FOR EXAMPLE, MUST PROVE
MECHANICAL
BREAKDOWN, THAT “COT” WAS PROXIMATELY CAUSED BY A PERIL INSURED,
THAT THERE WAS NO EXCLUSION OR LIMITATION THAT
POLICYHOLDER
MUST AMASS THE
CHANGE OF POLICY
WORDING REVERSES THIS PROCESS
ESTIMATED UNINSURED
● Earthquake, Flood, and Wind
Exclusions: Using the coverage forms issued under a Package Policy or Separate
Property Policy makes it expensive or impossible to obtain coverage for these perils, especially in the critical
zones, such as
REINSURANCE
TREATIES
COVERAGE IN THE AREAS MOST PRONE TO THESE PERILS. USING THE
RIGHT INSURER, WITH THE
MOST
ADVANTAGEOUS REINSURANCE
● Truck Transit Coverage: Package Policy or Separate Property Policy forms make it expensive and/or impossible
to obtain coverage for truck transit perils, especially Change of Temperature. “COT” is the most frequent Cause
of Loss during truck transit. Relying on truckers is not a good idea because they, either, do not have coverage
or do not have adequate coverage to pay large losses, especially COT, and may not have the cash to pay for an
uninsured event relating to
their
liability for damage to shipper’s goods.
HIGH PREMIUM
EXCLUSIONS MAKE IT
IMPOSSIBLE TO OBTAIN COMPLETE COVERAGE AT A REASONABLE
ESTIMATED UNINSURED
Key words: Mechanical, breakdown, boiler & machinery, power outage, care, custody
or
control, maintenance, coinsurance, valuation.
Key Products: IQF shrimp and similar seafood products; fresh, refrigerated
seafood
products, block frozen seafood products.
Solution:
What does your policy cover?

Capitol Risk Concepts,
Ltd. Tel: